Jane Seymour continued to linger on 20 October 1537, three
days after she had been given the last rites. The fact that she survived so
long while gravely ill hints at her strength of character and will. Death
usually came more swiftly for women who contracted an infection in childbed.
We know very little of Jane Seymour’s character. Unlike her
predecessor, Anne Boleyn, she did not excite the indignation of the Imperial
ambassador, Eustace Chapuys, who provided many of the surviving accounts of
Anne’s spoken words and behaviour. Admittedly, Chapuys recorded none of the
good that Anne did, but his accounts do at least give us an idea of her spirit.
Chapuys does not seem to have had a particularly high
opinion of Jane. Before her marriage, he commented that she ‘is not a woman of
great wit, but she may have good understanding’. He also doubted her virginity
at the time of her marriage to Henry (considering it unlikely that any woman
could have been at court as long as Jane without taking a lover) and criticised
her appearance. It appears that Jane looked better when dressed to impress –
Henry VIII’s seventeenth century biographer, Edward Herbert, claimed that Sir
John Russell, who had observed Jane believed that ‘the richer Queen Jane was in
clothes, the fairer she appeared, but that the other [Anne], the richer she was
apparelled, the worse she looked’.
Chapuys believed that Jane had ‘been well taught for the most
part by those intimate with the king, who hate the Concubine [Anne], that she
must by no means comply with the king’s wishes except by way of marriage; in
which she is quite firm’. It appears that she was coached in how to behave with
Henry during the last months of his marriage to Anne. She played the role
beautifully, showing herself as an honest and demure young woman and adopting the submissive motto 'Bound to Obey and Serve'. She was a great success, just as she was successful in persuading
Henry to bring his eldest daughter, Mary, back to court.
Jane also had strong religious views. In the summer of 1536
she showed her support for monasticism when she offered the king 2000 marks if
the nunnery at Catesby could be saved. There is also some evidence that she was
involved in attempts to save Clementhorpe nunnery in Yorkshire. She certainly
attempted to intercede with Henry on behalf of the rebels during the Pilgrimage
of Grace, which was a popular uprising in favour of traditional religion in
late 1536. Martin Luther considered her to be ‘an enemy of the Gospel’, something
which could have made the reign of her son, Edward VI, very different in
character had she lived.
The surviving evidence, such as it is, suggests that Jane
was not as meek and demure as her public image implied. She was a woman who was
able to attract the king and hold his interest, becoming politically involved
in a conspiracy that ended in the death of her predecessor. She also attempted
to involve herself in the politics of the reign, although, with the threat of
Anne Boleyn’s fate hanging over her, she ensured that she trod carefully.
If Jane had lived, it is probable that she would have ruled
as regent for her nine year old son in 1547. If this had been the case, we
might well remember Henry VIII’s third wife very differently. As it was,
however, on 20 October 1537, only eight days after her child’s birth, Jane
Seymour was dying.
How interesting! Believe it or not I've actually never thought of the fact that had she survived it's very likely she would have served as Edward's Regent. However I'm sure that had she survived (and providing Edwards difficult birth she was able) that she would have become pregnant again and whos to say that she would survive that birth? Then again, Edwards birth could have left her sterile like Margaret Beaufort or perhaps Henry's increasing impotency would prevent the chance of any further issue. But what if Edward died in 1554? What would be her role then? I'm sure she would have played a prominent role in Mary's court. What about after Mary's death? Would Elizabeth still be included in the succession without the help of Catherine Parr?
ReplyDeleteYou've opened a whole new world of "what if's" Ms Norton!
Thanks for your comment - lot's of what ifs! What if Jane's second child had been girl? under the terms of the second Act of Succession, that daughter would have succeeded Edward and not Mary. What would Mary have done then???
Delete